Granny's Blog
Obama's Fiscal Apocalypse
Saturday, 28 January 2012 22:38

I hate folks who try to use numbers on me, particularly during election season. Honey, we've got ourselves a bumper crop of pontificators on the subject of the U.S. debt, deficit, budget and spending.  Good Lord.  Now, I believe in numbers, mind you, but more often than not folks who talk numbers to me during election season are either dumb or crookeder than a dog's hind leg.  Since smart people like you don't dispute the fact that 2+2=4, any half-wit can get away with paralyzing you with a fog of incomprehensible data.  He'll tool on down the road while you sit there like a tom cat blinking at the moon.  Let me tell you something right now:  when my sacred vote is at stake, I don't put up with jackasses who think nobody is going to check their numbers.  Honey, I have the internet and I know how to use it.

Now, I'm writing this blog entry because I have been plagued with hysterical viral emails wailing about the financial apocalypse that Barack Obama has unleashed upon us all.  They say Obama's capricious spending habits are a threat to human civilization!  To prepare for the imminent cataclysm I stopped calling the exterminator because I figured when the food chain collapses rats and cockroaches might be pretty good eating.  The thing is, as many times as I looked at the numbers reported in the frantic emails I kept receiving, I just couldn't see where they had any basis in fact and I started resenting my rodent infested bunker.  I'm not an expert on our budget, deficit, or debt but honey I can Google like it's nobody's business.  I spent so many hours reviewing old budget documents, OMB reports, CBO reports, historical tables, news articles, etc. that Gramps threw a fit and threatened to cut me off from LiePie.com if I didn't tone it down a little.  Now that I've poked around some, I'm almost hopeful that I might not be a witness to the demise of mankind after all.

My point is not to debate the merits of George W. Bush and Barack Obama--they both faced unique challenges early in their presidencies, both men dealt with those challenges as best they could for good or for ill, and you can go have that argument with someone who has more energy than me.  I'd just like to put Barack Obama's stewardship of the economy into proper perspective so you can crawl out of your barricade, take a hot bath, and enjoy a double ration of biscuits and stale water.

I think it would be helpful to have some idea of what our fiscal condition would be right now had we hustled Barack Obama into a suspended animation chamber on his inauguration day and none of his disastrous policies were ever enacted into law.  Aren't you convinced that if we had only remained on the course George W. Bush laid out for us, we'd be better off?  Where would we be right now were it not for Barack Obama?  Well, George W. Bush gave us that very information back on February 4, 2008.  On that day, Bush submitted his budget for fiscal year 2009 (a "fiscal year" is what folks like me call "October 1 through September 30."), and he was nice enough to extrapolate his vision all the way out to 2013!

Let's look at Bush's own spending forecast for fiscal years 2009-2013 and compare those numbers to Obama's horrendous performance for those same fiscal years.  If all the viral emails are correct, the difference in those figures is a vast, nightmarish expanse outside our human comprehension! Bush's spending for fiscal years 2009-2013 is in ORANGE below.  Obama's spending for fiscal years 2009-2013 is in GREEN.  The figure in BLUE is from an update submitted by the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) on January 8th, 2009 just before that fateful day when Obama was sworn into office:

  • Bush's spending outlays above are from Table 1.1 on page 22 of Bush's FY09 budget here.  Obama's spending outlays above are from Table 1.1 on pages 22-23 of Obama's FY12 budget here.
  • I got the figures for the war costs from this CRS report right here.
  • I confirmed that the CBO's FY09 spending figure update above did not include the cost of the AMT patch and included only $68 billion for war funding. If you want to see for yourself, read about the AMT patch on page 12 and the war funding on page 21 here.  The CRS says we spent $155 billion on the war in FY09, so I included the additional $87 billion in the FY09 war cost column.

The difference between our remaining on the gentle 5-year course laid out for us by George W. Bush and careening down the 5-year runaway truck ramp with Barack Obama is about $890 billion. Barack Obama is costing us an extra $178 billion a year. GOOD LORD ALMIGHTY-----THAT'S IT??????? I've been taste testing rat jerky recipes and storing praline cockroaches in tins for three years, honey, and I most certainly didn't go to all that effort over the anticlimactic prospect of an additional $178 billion a year in spending!

What's wrong with all these folks who are telling us that Barack Obama has spent trillions of dollars these last 3 1/2 years?  Mercy me. Honey, anybody who tries to tell you that Barack Obama has spent us into oblivion is either dumber than a tree, a nut, lying to himself, or lying to you--take your pick.  There just ain't any other explanation.  $178 billion is certainly nothing to sneeze at, but that's a little over 1/3 the cost of 1-year's worth of the Bush tax cuts, $480 billion.  I don't remember hearing about any pitchfork mob descending on George W. Bush back on February 4, 2008 when he released the exact numbers you are looking at above, and I seem to recall how incensed folks were that Barack Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire.  You just can't let folks have it both ways, honey.  Either $178 billion is a lot of money or it isn't. If wasn't a lot of money when George W. Bush was president, then it isn't a lot of money now that Barack Obama is president.

And don't any of you whiny piss-ants start picking at my methodology.  I told you, my only goal was to put Barack Obama's stewardship of the economy into proper perspective, and the way I did so was very simple and fair. The numbers above are exceedingly generous to George W. Bush--his February 4, 2008 spending projections didn't include any extra costs for the 4.4 million jobs the Bureau of Labor Statistics says were lost between February 2008 and the end of January 2009 when Barack Obama was inaugurated.  The CBO gave us a new number for FY09, but anyone who doesn't think there would have been any additional spending on recovery measures, unemployment extensions, Medicaid, and food stamps in fiscal years 2010-2013 is a loon.  Good Lord, George Bush signed the Unemployment Extension Act of 2008 while he was packing up to leave the White House!  And if you don't think I should have added the AMT patch and the war costs to George Bush's spending, then either you aren't very bright or you are dishonest.

Once again, you are better off riding in a baboon-chauffeured limousine than trusting viral emails for guidance. The TV and radio talkers aren't any better, let me tell you. I don't know about you, but I'm going to be careful who I listen to over the course of this election season, and anyone who gets on the TV or radio or sends me a viral email saying that Barack Obama's spending has plummeted the country into financial ruin isn't getting one second more of my time. I'm sorry you spent the last three years hoarding toilet paper and matches like I did, but it's all behind us now and hopefully we've learned our lesson. In the future, we won't put so much stock in hysterical folks lobbing incoherent numbers at us, will we honey? Come here and give me a squeeze. You know I love you no matter what.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
Poor Man's Pie
Monday, 15 August 2011 20:53
"Poor Man's Pie" is a recipe that's been in my family for generations. It's very special to me for reasons that will be obvious below.  I'm very, very proud to share it with you:

Mix the following dry ingredients together in a bowl:

2 heaping tbsp flour
1 c. sugar
1/2 tsp salt

Add in 1 3/4 c. water and stir until blended.

Pour into a pie crust, generously dot with butter, and sprinkle with nutmeg.

Bake at 350 degrees for a good hour at least.  It's done when it's cooking at a rapid boil throughout.


I've been hearing a lot of talk lately from folks who fancy themselves to be "rugged individualists" calling for the dismantling of all our social safety nets.  I was surprised to learn from these work-calloused, leathery-skinned individuals that Social Security and Medicare are creeping socialism.  This delusional cult of "self-starters" says it's high time we rolled back the New Deal so we can all truly know freedom once again.  They insist they can manage just fine without any "hand-outs" from Big Government, and anyone who can't is shiftless and lazy.  I wonder how long these folks would have lasted during the Great Depression.  I'll tell you about a couple of so-called "socialists" who did survive the Great Depression thanks to "government hand-outs," and you can be the judge of who's shiftless and lazy.

My gramps had to quit school in the fifth grade to go to work and help feed his family.  He grew up farming his family's land while his father and younger siblings dug wells for folks with their rig and team of horses.  He married my granny in his early twenties, and after living with his parents for several years out of necessity, they started their own family and forged out on their own.

My gramps was a hunter.  Deer, rabbit, squirrel, pheasant, quail, turkey--you name it, my gramps shot it and his family ate it.  He fished, and even brought home a snapping turtle on occasion.  He was a gardener, and everything grown in his garden was cooked, canned or stored by Granny:  tomatoes, corn, green beans, peas, beets, pickles, potatoes, peppers, radishes, onions and carrots.  Gramps was a trapper, and knew how to tan and stretch his animal hides so he could sell them at the end of the season:  mink, skunk, muskrat, racoon, and fox.  He hunted walnuts.  He cut wood for the stove.  He picked strawberries, blueberries, apples, rhubarb, and wild plums and grapes for Granny to make into jelly.  He kept bees.  He was a handy man and carpenter.  Gramps always had on hand a couple of hunting dogs, some chickens, and a slaughter animal whenever he could get one.  He helped folks at every opportunity, and was so well-regarded by everyone he was appointed the town mayor, a job that paid next-to-nothing and mostly entailed sending home the drunks from the town square every Saturday night.  He played the violin and harmonica, rolled his own cigarettes, and always kept a pocketwatch in the breast of his overalls.

My granny made it to the eighth grade in school, but left home at fourteen to escape an abusive and alcoholic father.  She became a hired girl for Gramps' folks, and raised all the kids almost singlehandedly since Gramps' mother suffered from migraines and was too sickly to care for her family on her own.  After she married Gramps and they started their own family, she spent every hour of her waking days working to ensure her family's survival.  I asked my grandma once if Granny ever had any hobbies, and she said,  "Honey, she didn't have time for hobbies."  When Gramps came home from hunting with fresh game, Granny helped him skin and gut it and then cooked it for dinner.  She canned everything Gramps brought in from the garden, made jelly from the berries and fruit they gathered, and cracked the walnuts Gramps brought home, saving the meat for her baking and candy.  She made quilts, patched their clothes, and washed all the laundry on a washboard in a basin with water she hauled in from their well.  My grandma said Granny always scrubbed her and her two sisters within an inch of their lives.  I suspect her obsession with cleanliness was due to the fact that she lost her two sons, one at 18 months old from pneumonia and the other at age ten from kidney disease, as well as my grandma's hearing at age three from recurrent ear infections.

Despite all their industry, my grandma said that they would have all starved to death out there in the middle of the prairie had Gramps not been able to get work through the Works Progress Administration (WPA).  He made 50 cents a day, and worked building roads and bridges in the area.  After breaking their backs and paying in for their entire working lives, they started collecting their Social Security benefits and were eligible for Medicare when they turned 65.  My Granny lost her vision permanently during a cataract surgery that went wrong, and Gramps suffered from emphysema for the last several years of his life.  Thanks to Social Security and Medicare, my granny and gramps lived out their remaining days independently in their own tiny home rather than suffering the indignity of being a burden on their children and grandchildren.  I will always treasure my memories as a child of visiting their simple 5-room home that always smelled of bacon grease, spinning on the rope swing Gramps hung from a tall tree in their front yard, and basking in their love of laughter, life and family.

As you might expect, it's best that I avoid these self-declared "rugged individualist" ignoramuses who characterize people like my granny and gramps who needed help during tough times as lazy, shiftless socialists.  I guarantee you that two weeks of life during the Great Depression would permanently cure them of their smug utopian fantasies about "freedom."  These fools would be the first to eat their own young if the electricity went out for a week and the grocery store ran out of food.  A couple of weeks ago I visited my socialist grandma.  I baked her a Poor Man's Pie, and cried and took a picture of her hand while she was sleeping.  I can scarcely express my gratitude for her, my granny and gramps, and all the true rugged individualists in my family who made me the person I am today.  I am humbled by and bursting with pride at their genius, fortitude and tenacity in their daily lives, as well as their practical foresight in setting up a social safety net for the tough patches that would surely come for themselves and future generations.  Or, at least until the "rugged individualists" among us destroy it and we return to the good old days when people starved and froze to death in their own homes.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 11

Sponsored Links